ADVERTISEMENT

Feature Article

On-Site Model Is a Viable Option for Improving Health Care
2012;20(8):7

As the competition for the health care dollar continues, most medical organizations are trying to find more efficient, patient-friendly ways to offer their services. It seems likely that there will be a number of options that will be tried, and perhaps different solutions will be found for different areas of the country. The concept that a single delivery model will serve all areas of the country is probably not realistic. 


The “on-site” model described in this article is certainly one of the options to improve delivery of health care. There are a number of interesting findings in the comparison of the on-site model to the traditional model of health care delivery, according to Dr. Urion. The ones I would like to comment on include:


1. Wait for first visit (14 days for the on-site model versus 90 days for the traditional model)
2. Kept appointment rate for new visits (95% versus 67%)
3. Kept follow-up visit appointments (85% versus 50%)
4. Strikingly fewer ER visits and hospitalizations with the on-site model versus traditional model.


These features are not unrelated, as it is clear that timely appointments increase the likelihood that the patient will attend the appointment. I am impressed with the 95% attendance rate in the on-site model though, as my experience has not been quite as impressive. I have worked in both models and have experienced the patient response to timely appointments in on-site clinics firsthand, though I don’t believe I have ever had 95% of the patients show up, even for on-site appointments. I am absolutely convinced, however, that when the “no show” rate is 33% or greater, it is nearly impossible to efficiently schedule a clinic, and the inevitable result is increasing wait time for the appointments.


I am not certain what caused the decreased emergency room usage and lower hospitalization rates, and perhaps this feature requires more study. Regardless, the data presented suggest that the on-site model can be superior to the traditional model of  health care delivery, a finding that should encourage others to try versions of the on-site model or other models that might better suit the local health care market.


—John B. Bodensteiner, MD
Mayo Clinic Division of Child and Adolescent Neurology



ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Breaking News

More Headlines