|
|
|
|
NEW
TECHNOLOGY AIMS AT RESTORING LOST MOTOR FUNCTION
CHICAGOInnovative neurotechnology may give paralyzed patients with spinal cord injury, stroke, and motor neuron disorders greater independence and control over activities of daily living. With the use of a brain-computer interface system, John Donoghue, PhD, and colleagues showed that four tetraplegic patients were able to voluntarily modulate neural activity patterns in the motor cortex through imagined actions, despite having different forms of CNS impairment. One participant, unable to move or speak because of a brain stem stroke, learned to control a communication device and remotely operate a wheelchair using her thoughts.
"This is a particularly exciting time in the history of neurology and medicine," said Dr. Donoghue, at the 131st Annual Meeting of the American Neurological Association. "There are a number of neurotechnologies now emerging that will provide a whole range of new tools that will be available to treat and diagnose neurologic disorders." Dr. Donoghue is a Professor of Neuroscience and Director of the Brain Science Program at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, as well as a founder and Chief Scientific Officer of Cyberkinetics Neurotechnology Systems, Inc.
BRAINGATE
The BrainGate Neural Interface system, currently being tested in two pilot clinical trials led by Dr. Donoghue, is a direct neural interface designed to restore communication and limb movement to provide independence and restore function to persons with severe paralysis. The system consists of a tiny sensor implanted on the motor cortex that detects brain electrical activity, transmits it to a computer that analyzes the brain signals generated from the paralyzed patients. Those signals are interpreted and translated into cursor movements, allowing users to control a computer via thought processes, as well as operate a robotic arm, a prosthetic hand, and a number of external, everyday-living devices, such as televisions and light switches. A critical component in the system is a multi-electrode array, initially developed by Richard Normann, PhD, at the University of Utah, and further developed by Cyberkinetics.
"The concept behind this technology is simply to take the signals directly from the motor cortexfor example, from the arm area of the motor cortexand bring them to the outside," said Dr. Donoghue. "The current system has a percutaneous connector that connects to a computer cable to bring the signals outside, to a cart that contains computers that amplify, process, and interpret the signals. The brains intention to move is representedin the simplest caseas a cursor on the computer screen. In other words, what you would ordinarily do with your handmove the computer mouseyou would be doing by just thinking about moving it.... We actually detect and
decode the intended motion of the hand by analyzing patterns of motor cortical activity that are recorded by the sensor. Numerous labs have shown in monkeys that you can, in fact, decode the brain activity well enough that this signal can substitute for the hand to control a computer cursor."
One of the first issues to be addressed in using the technology was whether neural signals related to movement were still present in paralyzed people. "Much to our delight, as soon as we turned on the device, we saw neural activity," noted Dr. Donoghue. "Even years after an injury, in all of our patients, we see that the neural spiking activity remains.... Using electrode arrays, we can record many signals in real time in the motor cortex."
MIND OVER MATTER
In one experiment conducted by the investigators, one spinal cordinjured participant, for example, played a simple video game, moving a cursor, completely under neural control, to different targets. "He was able to move to the target, although the motion of the cursor was wobbly and it didnt stay still," said Dr. Donoghue. "With this sort of imperfect kind of cursor, he was able to achieve about 75% to 95% success of getting to targets
. His success rate, his speed, was about twice as slow as the average person." According to Dr. Donoghue, one of the most striking conclusions from the video game experiment was that all four patients, regardless of the cause of their paralysis, could imagine an action that resulted in similar quality of control.
Recent work has shown that cursor control can be substantially improved."Not only do we get a smoother motion; [participants] can also select click, using only neural activity in the motor cortex," commented Dr. Donoghue. "So we can sort of emulate your computer mouse function, and I think we can do a pretty good job of that, although it is slightly slower than you or I would do it."
In another demonstration, one participant used a cursor to sweep over an icon to open e-mail or draw. "Although that quality of control in this early demonstration is nothing like what we have, it was similar to what maybe a 2- or 3-year-old child would have," said Dr. Donoghue. "Were basically asking and using that crude filter to get control using a few dozen neurons when normally we use millions of neurons. Advances in the mathematical decoding strategies have led to significant improvements in the quality of control."
In another example, one participant, who was anarthric and tetraplegic, used a cursor to spell out words and phrases. Letters would light up when she pointed and clicked on them. In addition, words would pop up on the screen when a built-in word prediction sensor would offer selections based on what the software anticipated she was trying to spell."Now she can choose to speak a whole phrase through a voice she chose from several selections provided in the software," noted Dr. Donoghue. "This provides a communication interface for those who without assistive technology would not otherwise be able to communicate at all. Weve also set it up so she can use a television interface, to control television sets and other devices."
The investigators also tried to show whether individuals could learn to control physical devices and control them without using a computer interface. With the aid of a motorized prosthetic hand, Dr. Donoghues group decoded a patients brain signals and used them to control the motor that opened and closed the hand. "We just had him look at the hand," explained Dr. Donoghue. "Now hell say open and close, and youll see the action of the hand as he imagines that. What is significant about this is that it could allow him to manipulate objects so effectively that he can interact with this world for controlling devices."
The patient was also able to use a simple toy robot as an interface to close a type of hand gripper, grabbing a piece of candy and dropping it in the technicians hand. "It took him about seven minutes from the time we set up the robot for him to get it," said Dr. Donoghue. "So he quickly integrates how to use this neural activity to do something useful. Again, these are very simple demonstrations. They need a lot of work before they are something that is a practical device."
Taking that next step and turning the BrainGate system into a practical device would require eliminating the cart of electronics and connection pedestal, as well as the technician. Dr. Donoghues group is now working on developing a fully implantable device.
"Ultimately, we hope that there would be a wide range of ways that we can connect the motor cortex up to wheelchairs, computers, and other devices," said Dr. Donoghue. "But I think one of the things that is really exciting is the ability to hook this back up to the muscles again in spinal cordinjured patients." He and his colleagues are also developing a neural prosthesis that uses the BrainGate system to actually control the arm and hand of a person with tetraplegia. "Were not saying that this person is going to move in what is considered a normal way," Dr. Donoghue pointed out. "Our goal is to get that persons arm supported in an orthotic device, to have the hand open and close under neural control and grab, say, a cup and bring that cup to the mouth. If we do that within five years, we will be very excited.
"We are on a path to actually reconstruct the nervous system in [a process] that sends the brain signals back to the muscles again," Dr. Donoghue continued. "But I think that really is an ambitious and very long-term goal. But we see some day that there would be this vision of a bidirectional interface of physical components with the nervous system that are able to restore sensory input and motor output. In addition, I think we can allow patients to participate in their own rehabilitation, that is, motion of the limb, through an exoskeleton that is neurally controlled
. I could further envision one day implanting neural interface technology, placed at or near the location of an epileptic seizure, to report that a seizure is going to happen. Neurons are very sensitive measures of what is going on in the brain. By predicting that a seizure was about to happen, a patient could, for example, get off the road, or take medication to reduce or prevent the seizure. Or, connect it
in a way to deliver medication directly to the epileptic site. I think the promise of the future is extremely bright, and I think this is just the very beginning of this whole field."
NR
Colby Stong
Suggested Reading
Hochberg LR, Serruya MD, Friehs GM, et al. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature. 2006;442:164-171.
|
| |
CUTTING EDGEA CLOSER LOOK AT MULTI-ELECTRODE ARRAYS
CHICAGOThe Utah Electrode Array is an example of a new generation of neural interfaces, according to Richard Normann, PhD. The Utah Electrode Array consists of one hundred 1.5 mm-long penetrating silicon needles that project out from a 4-mm x 4-mm x 0.25-mm-thick substrate, designed for cortical applications. "When this device is implanted in cortical tissues, it can selectively communicate with hundreds of neurons," said Dr. Normann at the ANA meeting. "An advantage of this technology is that these electrodes are actually microneedles, and they are implanted into the cortex. These electrodes actually displace the tissue, rather than cut through it
. The bottom line is that it is a safe and efficacious technology." Dr. Normann is a Professor of Bioengineering and Ophthalmology and Visual Science at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City.
Dr. Normanns research has focused on such topics as sight restoration in the blind by cortical electrical stimulation and stimulation of the cochlear nerve to evoke selective activation of the auditory cortex as an auditory neuroprosthesis. He is also working on a way to get spinal cordinjured individuals out of their wheelchairs. "Our approach is to implant Utah Electrode Arrays in the motor cortex to obtain information of the volitional intent of the subject, process that information, and send it down to Utah Electrode Arrays, implanted in the peripheral nerves causing muscle contraction," he said. "Clearly, this is a very ambitious project.
"If we are successful in getting an individual out of a wheelchair and standing alone, that would be a prelude to getting him or her to walk. We havent started to work with humans yet. We are working with animals. And so our task at the University of Utah has been to produce graceful, physiologically based stance in anesthetized animals. We are doing this by activating the muscles that extend the hip, knee, and ankle."
Another application that Dr. Normann and colleagues are working on is a project sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the central research and development organization of the US Department of Defense. DARPA foresees the next generation of prosthetic arms to be neurally controlled, noted Dr. Normann. "[DARPA] wants [soldiers with an amputated limb] to have control of the device just by their volitional intent, and to experience the sensations of touch produced by the prosthetic hand," he said.
"Our proposal to do this is to implant some form of direct osseo-integrated device into the existing bone and attach a prosthetic limb to that bone that will contain a large number of actuators," he said. "Actuators for all the digits, for wrist rotations, and so forth
. When the individual has the desire to activate motion, that intent will be conveyed to the actuators with a Utah Electrode Array implanted in the nerves of the amputated arm. We are optimistic that this can be done, because of a similar experiment done in England."
Dr. Normann referred to a professor in England who ordered a Utah Electrode Array and had it implanted in the nerves of his forearm for about six months. During that time he was able to train his brain to control external devices, like a wheelchair. He could make a wheelchair go ahead and stop just by volitional thought. "Six months later, after explantation, there were no consequences of the implantation, indicating the safety and efficacy of this technique," said Dr. Normann.
"Were not home free yet," he cautioned. "There are many challenges in this field. We want to do behavioral experiments in primates. We want to develop and use wireless implant systems
. We need to develop new kinds of algorithms to control the signals that go through these devices. We need to enhance biocompatibility. We need FDA approval for investigational devices. And we look forward to doing human implantation and experimentation.
"Our goal, and I think we will be successful in this goal, is to use these new neural interfaces to restore limited function to those who have lost function," Dr. Normann continued. "However, I dont believe that we are going to be able to augment function to those who already have good function."
NR
Colby Stong
Suggested Reading
Shoham S, Halgren E, Maynard EM, Normann RA. Motor-cortical activity in tetraplegics. Nature. 2001;413:793.
Return to table of contents
|
|